Morris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to show abuse of discretion through imposition of voir dire time limit, defendant must show that unexamined panelist actually served on jury
• to show abuse of discretion through imposition of voir dire time limit, defendant must show that unexamined panelist actually served on jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tamez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-31· cited 109×
• Kemph v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-11-24· cited 19×
• Marco Antonio Munoz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-09-23
• Kenric Leal Marshall v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-09-23
• David Mauk v. Pipe Creek Water Well, LLC and Robert Rae Powell
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-01-15
• Crystal Yanez v. David Hernandez, Jr.
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2020-08-31

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-11-27· cited 179×
• McCarter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 143×
• De La Rosa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-05-03· cited 118×
• Ratliff v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-05· cited 114×
• Abron v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-23· cited 98×
• Mathis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 95×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-26· cited 84×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 78×
• Mathis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-04-08· cited 76×
• Burkett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-11-13· cited 42×
• Tobar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 6×