Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/6/2000
Blair v. State
Citations
- 747 A.2d 702
- 130 Md. App. 571
- 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that the witness, a co-defendant, had a motive to fabricate at the moment the crime was committed, if not earlier
- acknowledging that the consistent statement detracted from defense counsel’s impeachment of the witness’s inconsistent statement
- regarding admissibility of statement offered under Md. Rule 5-616(c)(2) to rehabilitate witness
- regarding admissibility of statement offered under Md. Rule 5-616(c)(2) to rehabilitate witness
- “Md. Rule 5-616(c) does not relieve a party seeking to admit a statement under the rule of the obligation to show the statement’s relevance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-01· cited 22×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-10-22· cited 19×
- Storetrax.com, Inc. v. GurlandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-03-31· cited 16×
- Fontaine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-28· cited 15×
- 100 Harborview Drive Condominium Council of Unit Owners v. ClarkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-30· cited 15×
- Hajireen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-02· cited 14×
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-28· cited 10×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 9×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-03-30· cited 8×
- Cutchin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-01· cited 8×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-25· cited 5×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-01· cited 5×
- Dyson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-13· cited 4×
- Coryea Dominique Webster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-28· cited 3×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-02-26· cited 2×
- Acker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-09-30· cited 2×
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-05· cited 1×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 1,195×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-01-10· cited 570×
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1974-12-19· cited 231×
- In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardFourth Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 151×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- United States v. (Under Seal)Fourth Circuit· 1984-11-16· cited 134×
- The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1976-07-13· cited 117×
- State v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-26· cited 86×
- Keenan v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 85×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-07-30· cited 69×
- In Re DoeFourth Circuit· 1981-10-26· cited 67×
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-08· cited 52×
- Carr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-22· cited 51×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-07-02· cited 42×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-19· cited 42×
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-11· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.