Skip to main content

Blair v. State

Citations

  • 747 A.2d 702
  • 130 Md. App. 571
  • 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that the witness, a co-defendant, had a motive to fabricate at the moment the crime was committed, if not earlier
  • acknowledging that the consistent statement detracted from defense counsel’s impeachment of the witness’s inconsistent statement
  • regarding admissibility of statement offered under Md. Rule 5-616(c)(2) to rehabilitate witness
  • regarding admissibility of statement offered under Md. Rule 5-616(c)(2) to rehabilitate witness
  • “Md. Rule 5-616(c) does not relieve a party seeking to admit a statement under the rule of the obligation to show the statement’s relevance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.