Moriconi v. AT & T WIRELESS PCS, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The statutory language, the legislative history, and the savings clause compel the conclusion that Congress envisioned that consumers would not be deprived of their state law causes of action for consumer related fraud.”
• “the legislative history [of § 332] supports the finding that Congress specifically intended to reserve for states the right to regulate and resolve such matters as “customer billing information,” “billing disputes,” and “other consumer protection matters”
• “In this case, Plaintiff and prospective Class Member held no joint title to any portion of AT & T’s profits prior to the commencement of this lawsuit. The Complaint seeks to vindicate individual rights based on separate purchases of wireless service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).