Skip to main content
· 6/27/1996

Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership

Citations

  • 88 F.3d 536
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that IGRA “completely preempts state laws regulating gaming on Indian lands ” (emphasis added)
  • holding that after Quackenbush appeal rather than mandamus is appropriate where by remand District Court surrendered jurisdiction and there is no other opportunity to appeal decision in federal court
  • stating that a district court has no discretion to remand a claim that states a federal question
  • stating that complete preemption is limited to “[a]ny claim which would directly affect or interfere with a tribe’s ability to conduct its own [gaming] licensing process”
  • stating that a district court has no discretion to remand a claim that states a federal question
  • finding that the “district court never lacked subject matter jurisdiction” when it remanded a case under § 1367(c) after determining albeit, erroneously, that no federal claims remained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.