Toller v. SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court had requested “summary-judgment-type evidence” and supplemental briefing on the question of the amount in controversy
• “Thus, using the value of the coverage at issue as measured by the cost to purchase those coverages, the amount in controversy for the class members’ claims would be $10,123,282.”
• CAFA’s “provision requiring aggregation of the plaintiffs’ claims is inconsistent with the old rule that required that the 4 amount in controversy be viewed solely from the plaintiff’s viewpoint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).