Skip to main content

Morales v. State

Citations

  • 133 A.3d 527
  • 2016 Del. LEXIS 42
  • 2016 WL 354855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statement “the defendant is clearly guilty of robbery” was improper because it lacked a qualifier and expressed a personal opinion as to the defendant’s guilt
  • finding a statement that the defendant was “clearly guilty” was “not so clearly prejudicial as to jeopardize the fairness and integrity of the trial process” under plain error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Valihura, Strine, Holland, 'Valihura, Vaughn, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.