Kirkley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the prosecutor is allowed to argue all legitimate inferences of the defendant’s guilt that follow from the evidence.”
• stating that “the prosecutor began his closing rebuttal argument with” the improper vouching at issue in that case
• \This Court has consistently reaffirmed that the prosecutor is allowed to argue all legitimate inferences of the defendant’s guilt that follow from the evidence.\
• “This Court has consistently reaffirmed that the prosecutor is allowed to argue all legitimate inferences of the defendant’s guilt that follow from the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).