Skip to main content

Watters v. State

Citations

  • 129 Nev. 886
  • 313 P.3d 243
  • 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 94
  • 2013 WL 6224480
  • 2013 Nev. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the use of a PowerPoint presentation during opening statement that includes a slide of the defendant's booking photograph with the word \GUILTY\ written across it is error as it undermines the presumption of innocence
  • observing that the opening statement serves to state the issues and evidence to be presented
  • providing that the opening statement should be limited to the evidence the State intends to offer and believes to be admissible
  • explaining that opening statements provide an opportunity to outline the evidence to be presented, not for argument
  • providing that opening statement should set forth evidence believed in good faith to be available and admissible and reviewing challenges to opening statement for abuse of discretion
  • providing that opening statement should set forth evidence believed in good faith to be available and admissible and reviewing challenges to opening statement for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parragiurre, Pickering, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.