Skip to main content
· 8/21/2006

Moore v. Strickland (In Re Strickland)

Citations

  • 350 B.R. 158
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1814
  • 2006 WL 2403550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even if debtor’s interest in hair stylist business had nominal value, it would be material since it related to the debtor’s business dealings; therefore disclosure on debtor’s Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs was required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary F. Walrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.