· 9/26/2000
In Re: Milton Keeney, Debtor. Milton W. Keeney v. Mary Jean Smith
Citations
- 227 F.3d 679
- 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1449
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741
- 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 218
- 2000 WL 1375450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding proper standard of proof in a § 727(a)(4)(A) proceeding is proof by a preponderance of the evidence rather than by clear and convincing evidence
- noting that courts may deduce fraudulent intent from all the facts and circumstances of a case
- stating that the burden of proof for denial of discharge under § 727(a)(4)(A) is preponderance of the evidence
- stating that the burden of proof for denial of discharge under § 727(a)(4)(A) is preponderance of the evidence
- requiring a subjective intent on the debtor’s part to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor
- affirming finding of intent where transfers made while judgment pending and property omitted from schedules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krupansky, Norris, Suhrheinrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.