Skip to main content
· 9/26/2000

In Re: Milton Keeney, Debtor. Milton W. Keeney v. Mary Jean Smith

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 679
  • 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1449
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 218
  • 2000 WL 1375450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding proper standard of proof in a § 727(a)(4)(A) proceeding is proof by a preponderance of the evidence rather than by clear and convincing evidence
  • noting that courts may deduce fraudulent intent from all the facts and circumstances of a case
  • stating that the burden of proof for denial of discharge under § 727(a)(4)(A) is preponderance of the evidence
  • stating that the burden of proof for denial of discharge under § 727(a)(4)(A) is preponderance of the evidence
  • requiring a subjective intent on the debtor’s part to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor
  • affirming finding of intent where transfers made while judgment pending and property omitted from schedules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Norris, Suhrheinrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.