In the Matter of Sidney Steiker, A/K/A Sydney Steiker, A/K/A Sidney G. Steiker, Bankrupt. Sidney Steiker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying the “well-settled principle[ ]” that “the making of a false oath is sufficient to justify an inference of an intent to defraud creditors”
• identifying the “well-settled principle[ ]” that “it is sufficient that the bankrupt knows what is true and, so knowing, willfully and intentionally swears to what is false”
• identifying the “well-settled principle[ ]” that in discharge objections “the burden of proof is on the objecting [party] to make out a prima facie case, but once he has done so the burden shifts to the bankrupt”
• “Though ultimate findings are subject to appellate scrutiny free of the ‘clearly erroneous’ rule . . . those findings should be undisturbed where they are supported by the underlying factual determinations which cumulatively satisfy the applicable standard of proof. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).