Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/22/2011

Moore v. State

Citations

34 A.3d 513
424 Md. 118
2011 Md. LEXIS 781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a weapon did not have to be operable to come within the definition of “firearm” in one statute even if operability was required in another statute with “an altogether different objective”
recognizing that a weapon did not have to be operable to come within the definition of “firearm” in one statute even if operability was required in another statute with “an altogether different objective”
recognizing that a weapon did not have to be operable to come within the definition of “firearm” in one statute even if operability was required in another statute with “an altogether different objective”
“In [amending a statute regarding firearms], the [General Assembly] was aware, and in any event, is presumed to have been aware, of this Court’s interpretation of ‘firearm’ in light of that federal statute.” (Cita tions omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.