Baltimore Harbor Charters, Ltd. v. Ayd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that `[w]e have long applied the principal of statutory construction, \expressio unius est exclusio alterius \....'
• holding that “[w]e have long applied the principal of statutory construction, ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius’.... ”
• holding that “[w]e have long applied the principle of statutory construction, ‘expressio unis est exdusio alterius,’ the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another”
• holding that '[w]e have long applied the principal of statutory construction, “expressio unius est exclusio alterius Accord Biggus v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 328 Md. 188, 214, 613 A.2d 986, 999 (1992
• determining that whether employee was entitled to treble damages under Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Act was question for jury
• determining that whether employee was entitled to treble damages under Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Act was question for jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).