Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Schlossberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Legislature presumed to have intended that all its enactments operate together as a consistent and harmonious body of law
• holding general enactment impliedly repealed by specific enactment
• holding general enactment impliedly repealed by specific enactment
• holding general enactment impliedly repealed by specific enactment
• “the statute whose relevant substantive provisions were enacted most recently [must] be held to have repealed by implication any conflicting provisions of the earlier statute”
• “It is well settled that when two statutes, one general and one specific, are found to conflict, the specific statute will be regarded as an exception to the general statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).