Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing “distinction between ‘legislative facts,’ those which help determine the content of law and policy, and ‘adjudicative facts,’ facts concerning the parties and events of a particular case”
• adjudicative facts, i.e., those concerning parties and events of particular case, are not subject to judicial notice, without affording parties opportunity to be heard
• adjudicative facts, i.e., those concerning parties and events of particular case, are not subject to judicial notice, without affording parties opportunity to be heard
• legislative facts, that is, facts that “help determine the content of law and policy,” are subject to judicial notice
• legislative facts, that is, facts that “help determine the content of law and policy,” can be “judicially noticed without affording the parties an opportunity to be heard”
• legislative facts, that is facts that ‘‘help determine the content of law and policy,’’ are subject to judicial notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Montes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-30· cited 281×
• Mahoney v. Lensink
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-30· cited 186×
• Barrett Builders v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 169×
• State v. Morrill
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 146×
• State v. Zayas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-09· cited 82×
• Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. Rell
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-30· cited 72×
• State v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-12· cited 68×
• State v. Carey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-08· cited 66×
• State v. Rizzo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer Partnership
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-02-27· cited 46×
• Nuspl v. Nuspl
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1986-04-10· cited 34×
• Derderian v. Derderian
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-04-16· cited 34×
• Benson v. Benson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-22· cited 22×
• Wasson v. Wasson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 21×
• Cariseo v. Cariseo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-17· cited 16×
• Azia v. Dilascia
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-31· cited 16×
• Breiner v. State Dental Commission
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-16· cited 14×
• Ferraro v. Ferraro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-10-04· cited 13×
• State v. Shanks
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-04-12· cited 10×
• Project Vote v. Kelly
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-07-27· cited 8×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
  Supreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 712×
• State v. Tomanelli
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-02-01· cited 82×
• Karp v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-03-22· cited 77×
• Guerriero v. Galasso
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-11-19· cited 73×
• Krawiec v. Kraft
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-27· cited 21×