Project Vote v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following similar reasoning in upholding a Pennsylvania statute that prohibited per-signature payment of those who register voters
• finding a statute content-neutral where the statute prohibited payment to persons who register voters based on the number of registrations or applications obtained
• declining to strike down laws regulating compensation of voter registration “volunteers”
• “Unlike adjudicative facts, which concern the particular parties before the Court, legislative facts relate to the content of the law itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).