Karp v. Urban Redevelopment Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the word `may'. . .is to be interpreted as mandatory rather than directory if the context of the statute permits and it is necessary to do so in order to make the statute effective to carry out the legislative intent.\
• ‘[t]here is no question . . . concerning our power to take judicial notice of files of the Superior Court, whether the file is from the case at bar or otherwise’
• no question exists concerning power of court to take judicial notice of files in Superior Court
• “[t]here is no question . . . concerning our power to take judicial notice of files of the Superior Court, whether the file is from the case at bar or otherwise”
• ‘[t]here is no question . . . concerning our power to take judicial notice of flies of the Superior Court, whether the file is from the case at bar or otherwise’
• ‘‘[t]here is no question . . . concerning our power to take judicial notice of files of the Superior Court, whether the file is from the case at bar or otherwise’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).