Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 4/4/2001
Moore v. Gibson
Citations
- 2001 OK CR 8
- 27 P.3d 483
- 72 O.B.A.J. 1065
- 2001 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
- 2001 WL 321989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The term ‘filed’ found in Section 1081 of Oklahoma’s Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act means when a properly verified application for post-conviction relief is delivered to the proper district court clerk for the purpose of filing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lile, Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burger v. ScottTenth Circuit· 2003-01-15· cited 226×
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-04-23· cited 126×
- Gamble v. CalboneTenth Circuit· 2004-07-13· cited 24×
- Loftis v. HarvanekTenth Circuit· 2016-02-10· cited 16×
- Moore v. GibsonTenth Circuit· 2001-05-10· cited 11×
- Dill v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2008-07-15· cited 11×
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-06-08· cited 8×
- Dubuc v. SirmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2001-07-03· cited 8×
- Hall v. WardTenth Circuit· 2004-10-19· cited 5×
- Scott v. FranklinTenth Circuit· 2005-02-18· cited 3×
- O'CONNOR v. OKLAHOMA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACPCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-08-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.