Moore v. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no extraordinary circumstances and noting that the petitioner knows that “legal mail in his prison was subject to delays”
• “Because Oklahoma does not recognize the prisoner mailbox rule, it is immaterial when [petitioner] gave his petition to prison officials.”
• “Because Oklahoma does not recognize the prisoner mailbox rule, it is immaterial when [the prisoner] gave his petition to prison officials____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burger v. Scott
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-01-15· cited 226×
• Boyd v. Simmons
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-01-30

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston v. Lack
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
• Marsh v. Soares
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-08-31· cited 871×
• Miller v. Marr
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 635×
• Allan Hoggro v. Bobby Boone, Warden
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-07-24· cited 276×
• Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. Cook
  Supreme Court· 1951-01-02· cited 269×
• Haag v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 187×
• Woody v. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1992-03-31· cited 69×
• Adams v. LeMaster
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 64×
• Moore v. Gibson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-04-04· cited 27×
• Banks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-01-15· cited 17×
• Hunnicutt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-12-16· cited 15×
• Behrens v. Patterson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-12-16· cited 10×
• Thompson v. Okanagan House, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2001-02-26· cited 6×