Dill v. Workman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prison lockdown does not qualify as an extraordinary circumstance
• holding that a prison lockdown does not qualify as an extraordinary circumstance
• concluding that habeas petitioner’s seventy-four day prison lock down that allegedly prevented him from accessing the prison law library “does not qualify as extraordinary” and that petitioner also failed to explain his delay in filing a petition after the lock down ended
• rejecting an argument that a state court’s delay in deciding a motion was a basis for equitable tolling because “the disposition of that motion is irrelevant to the calculation of the federal habeas limitations period”
• rejecting an argument that a state court’s delay in deciding a motion was a basis for equitable tolling because “the disposition of that motion is irrelevant to the calculation of the federal habeas limitations period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).