Mondragon v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an individual arrested and prosecuted based on a forged arrest warrant has a procedural due process claim once legal process has ratified the arrest and prosecution
• holding New Mexico statute of limitations for filing a § 1983 action is three years
• holding New Mexico statute of limitations for filing a § 1983 action is three years
• noting that “[t]he statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in New Mexico is three years”
• explaining that the limitations clock starts when legal process is instituted justifying plaintiff’s imprisonment
• explaining that an initial seizure is governed by the Fourth Amendment but that, at some point following arrest and certainly by the time of trial, “the constitutional analysis shifts to the Due Process Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).