Constien v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that service of a summons was defective where the plaintiff himself mailed the summons
• holding that Rule 4(c) “contains no mailing exception to the nonparty requirement for service”
• holding that Rule 4(c) “contains no mailing exception to the nonparty requirement for service”
• holding that Rule 4(c) “contains no mailing exception to the nonparty requirement for service”
• providing that the time period under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) “runs from the filing of the initial complaint” and that “later amendments to the complaint do not change the time limit except for newly added parties”
• stating that when a notice of appeal is filed while a Rule 59(e) and certain other post-judgment motions are pending, “the notice of appeal, and with it the appellate court’s jurisdiction, is suspended until such motions are disposed of”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shepherd v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-05-08· cited 28×
• Johnson v. Boston Public Schools
  First Circuit· 2018-10-12· cited 27×
• Barnum v. City of Tulsa
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-02-06· cited 24×
• Kornea v. J.S.D. Mgmt., Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-10-04· cited 15×
• Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2024-08-09· cited 13×
• Felders v. Bairett
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-03-09· cited 6×
• Dumas v. Decker
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-05-23· cited 6×
• Hurtado v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-04-19· cited 5×
• United States v. Capps
  Tenth Circuit· 2024-08-13· cited 3×
• Constien v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-02

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowles v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 3,839×
• Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 904×
• Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 667×
• Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 362×
• Bolden v. City of Topeka
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 347×
• Mondragon v. Thompson
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 172×
• Moya v. Schollenbarger
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-09-26· cited 126×
• Lindsey v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2006-08-22· cited 100×
• Warren v. American Bankers Ins. of Florida
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-10-30· cited 84×
• Julius J. Jones, Jr. v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-08-26· cited 46×
• Outlaw v. Airtech Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-06-24· cited 43×
• Gloria P. Sanchez-Mariani v. Herbert E. Ellingwood
  First Circuit· 1982-09-20· cited 30×
• State of Utah v. Norton
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-02-08· cited 26×
• Smith v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2006-11-07· cited 25×
• Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
  District of Columbia· 2008-08-07· cited 6×

Other cases named Constien v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Constien v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-02
• Constien v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-02