Harrington v. City of Nashua

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such admissions must be \clear\ in order to be binding
• explaining standard conditions of pretrial release do not rise to level of Fourth Amendment seizure
• interpreting a police officer's admission regarding the timing of a search
• “[Ljegal process ordinarily takes ‘the form of an arrest warrant (in which case the arrest would constitute the seizure
• \It remains an unanswered question whether a malicious prosecution claim is cognizable under the Fourth Amendment and section 1983 ....\
• “[o]rdinarily, a pleading admitting a fact alleged in an antecedent pleading is treated as a binding judicial admission, removing the fact from contention for the duration of the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).