BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counterclaim presented “greater ramifications” than original breach-of-contract suit because defendant sought interpretation of gas purchase contract which would have effect of defining obligations of parties under terms of contract for foreseeable future
• reviewing a declaratory-judgment claim that sought an interpretation of a gas-purchase contract, which would have the effect of defining the obligations of the parties under that contract in the future
• the UDJA is “‘not available to settle disputes already pending before a court.’”
• UDJA not available to settle issues already pending before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).