Runcie v. Foley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that claimant “seeks to completely re-start the 120-day period”
• “Here, appellant seeks to completely re-start the 120-day period. Thus, the holding in Mokkala , that ‘ refiling a previously nonsuited health care liability claim fails to restart the 120-day period,’ is squarely applicable.”
• noting that claimant “seeks to completely re-start the 120-day period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).