Mohammed v. Union Carbide Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \there are many ways by which [a litigant] can reasonably apprise himself of the legitimacy of a claim prior to pursuing it in court\
• a \reasonable inquiry\ at the very least requires some affirmative investigation
• the MARA and the Sherman Act require similar evidence of concerted action or combination, and similar tests are used under the two acts to determine if a corporation and its officers could have formed a conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).