Blair v. Checker Cab Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “an agent or employee cannot be considered a separate entity from his principal or corporate employer, respectively, as long as the agent or employee acts only within the scope of his agency of employment”
• trial court properly considered motion for summary disposition under appropriate subrule despite motion being framed under another subrule
• “[A]n agent or employee cannot be considered a separate entity from his principal or corporate employer, respectively, as long as the agent or employee acts only within the scope of his agency [or] employment.”
• looking to federal courts’ antitrust precedent to resolve state-law claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).