Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/4/1988
Miller v. Badgley
Citations
- 753 P.2d 530
- 51 Wash. App. 285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although CR 11 specifically mentions monetary sanctions, this does not preclude the court from imposing some other type of remedy or combination of remedies
- holding that, although CR 11 specifically mentions monetary sanctions, this does not preclude the court from imposing some other type of remedy or combination of remedies
- after 1985 amendment to CR 11, rule now imposes an objective rather than subjective standard of reasonableness
- U.C.C. provision on implied term of the contract that was central to the dispute
- “In order to be merchantable, goods need not be outstanding or superior .... ”
- attorneys may not avoid CR 11's requirement that they make a reasonable inquiry as to the factual basis for a motion \merely by claiming good faith conduct or personal ignorance of the groundless nature of a claim.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 618×
- Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-28· cited 220×
- Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-02-29· cited 159×
- Matter of Estate of LintWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 134×
- Murphy v. LintWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 133×
- American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 110×
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-01-15· cited 79×
- Rhinehart v. Seattle Times, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-13· cited 71×
- MacDonald v. Korum FordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-18· cited 68×
- Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 60×
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-22· cited 57×
- In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 56×
- Peoples State Bank v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-21· cited 53×
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-07-28· cited 48×
- Doe v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-10-11· cited 47×
- In the Matter of Guardianship of LaskyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-24· cited 38×
- Dautel v. Heritage Home Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-12-18· cited 33×
- Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-31· cited 30×
- Johnson v. Statewide Collections, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1989-07-21· cited 26×
- Warner v. Design & Build Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-10· cited 24×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1988-01-21· cited 679×
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Third Circuit· 1986-04-14· cited 402×
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1985-08-20· cited 268×
- Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1968-06-20· cited 236×
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1978-08-17· cited 216×
- Chester R. Robinson and Wife, Frances Earline Robinson, and Roy K. Ewart and David B. Black v. The National Cash Register CompanyFifth Circuit· 1987-03-05· cited 153×
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. TampourlosWashington Supreme Court· 1987-02-26· cited 149×
- Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 130×
- Cabell v. PettyFourth Circuit· 1987-02-05· cited 104×
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 102×
- United Energy Owners Committee, Inc., and Robert T. Gilleran v. United States Energy Management Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 78×
- Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-08-02· cited 69×
- Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court· 1971-04-22· cited 66×
- Southern Leasing Partners, Ltd. v. McMullanFifth Circuit· 1986-10-08· cited 66×
- Luda Foster, Etc. v. Ford Motor Company, McLean Trucking Company v. Ford Motor CompanyFifth Circuit· 1980-07-15· cited 45×
- Wilson v. HenkleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-25· cited 45×
- North Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. Access Road Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-05-22· cited 42×
- Lidstrand v. Silvercrest IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-19· cited 41×
- Hartwig Farms, Inc. v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-03· cited 40×
- Sessa v. RiegleE.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-02-22· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.