Skip to main content
· 5/4/1988

Miller v. Badgley

Citations

  • 753 P.2d 530
  • 51 Wash. App. 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although CR 11 specifically mentions monetary sanctions, this does not preclude the court from imposing some other type of remedy or combination of remedies
  • holding that, although CR 11 specifically mentions monetary sanctions, this does not preclude the court from imposing some other type of remedy or combination of remedies
  • after 1985 amendment to CR 11, rule now imposes an objective rather than subjective standard of reasonableness
  • U.C.C. provision on implied term of the contract that was central to the dispute
  • “In order to be merchantable, goods need not be outstanding or superior .... ”
  • attorneys may not avoid CR 11's requirement that they make a reasonable inquiry as to the factual basis for a motion \merely by claiming good faith conduct or personal ignorance of the groundless nature of a claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.