Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 8/6/1999

Mitchell v. United States

Citations

  • 44 Fed. Cl. 437
  • 1999 U.S. Claims LEXIS 190
  • 1999 WL 600578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the special burden created by pro se cases should be shared by the government under its obli gation “to see that justice is done for its citizens”
  • judicial review of a federal employee’s Title VII claim is in federal district court, and not in the United States Court of Federal Claims
  • the Court of Federal Claims has no jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement reached between employee and his federal employer to settle a claim of discrimination based on disability in violation of Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. § 791)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskir

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.