Hansson, Marian K. v. Norton, Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a reasonable hourly rate is guided by the USAO matrix in Title VII actions
• holding district court lacked jurisdiction over contract claim against United States for more than $10,000
• finding that “when a settlement agreement incorporates substantive provisions of federal law such that enforcement of the agreement requires the interpretation and application of federal law, that enforcement action arises under federal law and belongs in the district court”
• in indistinguishable scenario, discrimination suit “would be waived by [] execution of the . . . Agreement and could not be pursued until it was reinstated . . . or until there was a determination that the [Agency] had breached the Agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).