Skip to main content
First Circuit· 3/26/1998

Mitchell v. United States

Citations

  • 141 F.3d 8
  • 1998 WL 125030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an internist with specialties in hematology and oncology, could testify as to physicians' treatment of colonoscopy patient in wrongful death suit, even though he was not a specialist in gastroenterology
  • stating that expert’s lack of specialty practice in the area about which he testified went to weight not admissibility
  • finding an expert qualified to testify in an area outside his specialty but within his area of expertise
  • allowing internist with specialties in hematology and oncology to testify even though not a gastroenterologist
  • applying state statute of limitations to claim for benefits under ERISA but federal law to determine when cause of action accrued
  • modifying judgment on appeal to correct plaintiff’s name, an “error [that] is easily corrected,” because “[t]o hold otherwise would elevate form over substance” (quoting Santos v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 556 N.E.2d 983, 988 (Mass. 1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Stearns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.