Letch v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A medical expert need not be a specialist in the area concerned nor be practicing in the same field as the defendant.”
• “purpose of an offer of proof is to show an appellate court that the proponent had been prejudiced by the exclusion of offered evidence”
• “A medical expert need not be a specialist in the area concerned nor be practicing in the same field as the defendant.”
• expert need not be specialist in medical area concerned, but should have education, training, experience, and familiarity with subject matter of testimony
• \A medical expert need not be a specialist in the area concerned nor be practicing in the same field as the defendant.\
• \purpose of an offer of proof is to show an appellate court that the proponent had been prejudiced by the exclusion of offered evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).