Gonzalez-Pina v. Guillermo-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that claim preclusion did not apply where employee returning to work after first action was subjected to new conduct
• remarking that “‘[t]he mere existence of a scintilla of evidence’ in the nonmoving party’s favor is insufficient to defeat summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).