Skip to main content
First Circuit· 5/19/2010

Pagés-Ramírez v. Ramírez-González

Citations

  • 605 F.3d 109
  • 82 Fed. R. Serv. 781
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court abused its discretion by excluding expert witness testimony where proffered expert was a specialist in pediatrics and neonatal and perinatal medicine, and the expert was to testify as to a cesarean section performed by an obstetrician-gynecologist
  • finding that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to allow an expert to testify in a medical malpractice case where, “without [the expertj’s testimony on causation and the standard of care, the plaintiffs were unable to present evidence on two elements of their case”
  • “[T]he Rules of Evidence require that the judge admit expert testimony relevant to the disposition of the case when it will assist the trier of fact in understanding a fact in issue and rests on a reliable foundation.”
  • listing elements of medical malpractice under Puerto Rico law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Lipez, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.