C.H. v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s restitution argument was waived where he had invited any error regarding restitution
• holding that the appellant’s restitution argument was waived where he had invited any error regarding restitution
• “C.H. did not object to the juvenile court ordering him to pay restitution and, in fact, affirmatively agreed to pay the requested restitution” and therefore invited the error
• “invited error is not reversible error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).