Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 911 So. 2d 1211
  • 2005 WL 2155160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that Jimmy 2 Because the instant Jimmy Ryce case proceeded by jury trial, we confine our analysis and discussion to directed verdicts under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.480(b
  • noting “it is now settled law that the statutes authorizing civil commitment of sexually violent predators (i.e., the Jimmy Ryce Act), are civil”
  • “The liberty interests affected in Ryce Act proceedings are not dissimilar to the liberty interests involved in criminal proceedings, although there are obviously critical distinctions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anstead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.