District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/22/2010
Boatman v. State
Citations
- 39 So. 3d 391
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8980
- 2010 WL 2483749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The purpose of the thirty-day deadline is to minimize pretrial detention by requiring commitment trials -3- to be held promptly, not to give [the State] a proverbial ‘second bite at the apple.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster, Wetherell, Marstiller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 109×
- Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 93×
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-29· cited 55×
- Murray v. RegierSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-05· cited 53×
- Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-05-12· cited 20×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-09-08· cited 19×
- Kinder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-08· cited 14×
- State v. KinderSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 8×
- Meadows v. KrischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 8×
- Madison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-16· cited 6×
- Ennis v. RegierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-02· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.