Skip to main content

Hale v. State

Citations

  • 891 So. 2d 517
  • 2004 WL 2973859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the defendant must be in custody on January 1, 1999, the custody need not be one for a qualifying sexual offense
  • holding that the Jimmy Ryce “Act applies to all persons who are currently incarcerated and who at some point in the past have been convicted of a sexually violent offense”—the Act does not require that the current incarceration be for a sexually violent offense
  • \We find that the Ryce Act does not require that the respondent['s] current incarceration be for a sexually violent offense.\
  • competent substantial evidence must support jury verdict in Ryce Act case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.