Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[t]he defendant’s principal contention . . . is that the court erred in refusing to determine the validity of the separation agreement prior to ordering [him], contrary to that agreement, to pay temporary support’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Telesco v. Telesco
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-03· cited 229×
• Lucy v. Lucy
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-02-24· cited 64×
• Wolk v. Wolk
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 63×
• LaBow v. LaBow
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-08-17· cited 62×
• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-28· cited 30×
• Trella v. Trella
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-03-12· cited 14×
• Wilkens v. Wilkens
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-04-28· cited 12×
• O. A. v. J. A.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-01-27