Skip to main content

State v. Jacob

Citations

  • 214 P.3d 353
  • 2009 Alas. LEXIS 119
  • 2009 WL 2634632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prevailing party in a suit was not entitled to attorney's fees under AS 09.60.010(c) when the court did not reach the due process argument the party had raised
  • reviewing de novo whether claimants had adequately asked for enhanced fees in superior court
  • “Waiver is a legal issue that this court reviews de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, Winfree, Christen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.