Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 8/3/2004

Mitchell v. Fishbein

Citations

  • 377 F.3d 157
  • 2004 WL 1728004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • formulating a list of attorneys to represent indi- gent defendants is administrative, not judicial, in nature
  • stating that judicial immunity has been extended to nonjudicial officers, such as court clerks, who perform acts that are “‘functionally comparable’ to that of a judge’” or “are integrally related to an ongoing judicial proceeding” (citations omitted)
  • applying same factors but concluding that a state court screening committee’s role was not functionally comparable to that of a judge because, inter alia, there was no available avenue for judicial review of committee’s decisions
  • no such immunity for persons compiling lists of attorneys available to serve pursuant to Article 18-B in the future (“18-B Panels”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Kearse, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.