Skip to main content
· 6/20/2001

Jane M. Booking v. General Star Management Company and General Star Indemnity Company

Citations

  • 254 F.3d 414
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, although it has “broad discretion” to address such questions, the Court generally does not reach questions not addressed by district court
  • deciding issue . not reached below, in part, because it was “purely legal”
  • noting that “in most cases[,] trial judges can provide parties with an adequate opportunity to respond to” or flesh out “particular arguments by ordering addi- tional briefing”
  • including as one of the two reasons for considering an issue not reached below that the question was purely legal
  • noting that if a party raises a new argument, the district court can “provide parties with an adequate opportunity to respond … by ordering additional briefing or an extra round of oral argument”
  • including as one of the two reasons for considering an issue not reached below that the question was purely legal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.