Skip to main content
· 5/20/1994

Van Brode Group, Inc. v. Bowditch & Dewey

Citations

  • 633 N.E.2d 424
  • 36 Mass. App. Ct. 509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a trial judge has a large measure of discretion in deciding whether to admit or exclude expert opinion testimony”
  • “It is fundamental that a tort action cannot be sustained without proof of damages . . .”
  • “An expert should not be permitted to give an opinion that is based on conjecture or speculation from an insufficient evidentiary foundation”
  • “[i]t is fundamental that a tort action cannot be sustained without proof of damages, whether the action is framed as legal malpractice ... or breach of fiduciary duty . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Drebbn, Laurence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.