DiVenuti v. Reardon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• DiVenuti’s property was a business property which barred him from filing claim under section nine and required him to proceed with claim under section 11
• business plaintiff could not sue under §9 and therefore could not rely on violation of Chapter 176D alone to establish claim
• “Among the good reasons [ ] for which a motion to amend may be denied are that no justification for the lateness of the motion is apparent (beyond counsel for the moving party having had a late dawning idea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-09-06· cited 100×
• Frullo v. Landenberger
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-09-13· cited 39×
• Kunelius v. Town of Stow
  First Circuit· 2009-11-09· cited 36×
• John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-11-02· cited 35×
• Continental Insurance v. Bahnan
  First Circuit· 2000-06-26· cited 25×
• McGonagle v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-10-29· cited 18×
• Reddish v. Bowen
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-06-28· cited 13×
• F.C.I. Realty Trust v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1995-10-11· cited 12×
• Cambridge Chamber of Commerce v. Central Square Insurance Agency, Inc.
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1999-01-29· cited 12×
• Minkina v. Frankl
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-09-15· cited 9×
• Silva v. Steadfast Insurance Co.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2015-08-07· cited 9×
• Spencer Press, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-05-16· cited 6×
• Washington 138 LLC v. Reivax Properties, LLC
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2001-09-27· cited 6×
• Duffy v. Commerce Insurance
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2009-09-22· cited 6×
• Kay Construction Co. v. Control Point Associates, Inc.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2002-08-16· cited 5×
• Bateman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-09-03· cited 4×
• Larkin v. Dedham Medical Associates, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-07-31· cited 3×
• Vigorito v. City of Chelsea
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-05-09· cited 2×
• Riley v. Commercial Insurance Agency, Inc.
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1999-09-30· cited 2×
• Associated Chiropractic Service, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1998-08-21· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-04-04· cited 162×
• Jet Line Services, Inc. v. American Employers Insurance
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-04-24· cited 141×
• Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-10· cited 109×
• Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1978-05-17· cited 75×
• Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-29· cited 73×
• Transamerica Insurance Group v. Turner Construction Co.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-10-20· cited 54×
• Walsh v. Chestnut Hill Bank & Trust Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-02-12· cited 53×
• Hamed v. Fadili
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-18· cited 30×
• Christopher v. Duffy
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-07-06· cited 15×
• Greenberg v. Flaherty
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-05-28· cited 10×
• Hamed v. Fadili
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-04-27· cited 9×
• Boorstein v. City of Boston
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-03-06· cited 4×