Supreme Court of Florida· 6/20/2002
Mills v. State
Citations
- 822 So. 2d 1284
- 2002 WL 1338538
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 784.07 was not an enhancement statute because the victim's status as a law enforcement officer was an element of a reclassified crime
- finding that in the absence of contrary legislative intent related statutes should be read in pari materia
- finding that section 784.07 is an enhancement statute rather than a statute defining a new criminal offense
- noting that § 784.07 is an enhancement and reclassification statute rather than a statute defining a new criminal offense
- noting in the absence of a contrary legislative intent, the two statutory provisions in question should be read in pari materia
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 47×
- State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 47×
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-17· cited 43×
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-24· cited 11×
- Jomolla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24· cited 10×
- Gangapersad Ramroop v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-03-30· cited 10×
- Walsh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-04· cited 9×
- Pethtel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-09· cited 6×
- J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07· cited 5×
- State v. DarstSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 3×
- McDonald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 3×
- Ramroop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-04· cited 3×
- Talley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-07· cited 3×
- Esteves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-10· cited 1×
- Pacheco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-01· cited 1×
- Hutchins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-06· cited 1×
- Darst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 1×
- Purdy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-09· cited 1×
- JS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07
- HERBERT LEON GHENT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-07
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-02· cited 287×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-22· cited 218×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-08-29· cited 83×
- Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-29· cited 68×
- Holmes County School Bd. v. DuffellSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-09· cited 38×
- Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-28· cited 36×
- State v. FuchsSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-14· cited 33×
- State v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-03· cited 32×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-08-24· cited 27×
- State v. GrinageSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-05-18· cited 25×
- Gayman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-11· cited 17×
- Spann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-27· cited 17×
- Grinage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-19· cited 15×
- Carpentier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-25· cited 14×
- State v. CrumleySupreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 13×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-09-26· cited 9×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-28· cited 9×
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-20· cited 8×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.