Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 923 So. 2d 578
  • 2006 WL 733787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is clear that there is no double jeopardy prohibition against applying a habitual offender enhancement to a felony already reclassified under section 775.087(1).”
  • “A mistrial is warranted only when an error is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”
  • no double jeopardy where habitual felony offender enhancement was applied to an offense which was reclassified due to the use of a weapon under section 775.087(1)
  • “The jury expressly found that Roberts carried, used, threatened to use, or at tempted to use a weapon in committing both crimes. This is exactly what is required for reclassification ... under section 775.087(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.