Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 659 So. 2d 1060
  • 1995 WL 500396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant could receive a mandatory minimum sentence for possession of a firearm to run concurrently with an HFO sentence for offenses occurring within a single criminal episode
  • holding, based upon Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992), that for crimes arising out of a single criminal episode, minimum mandatory sentences must run concurrently rather than consecutively
  • “Jackson’s minimum mandatory sentence for possession of a firearm must run concurrent with the habitual offender minimum mandatory sentences, since both of these minimum mandatory sentences are enhancements”
  • prohibiting consecutive habitual offender minimum mandatory sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.