Levine v. Prudential Bache Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “Rule 9(b) requires only a general averment of knowledge”
• “[A] complaint does not run afoul of Rule 9(b) if the defendants can make enough sense of it so that they may mount an answer or defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-17· cited 115×
• Petri v. Gatlin
  N.D. Illinois· 1997-12-30· cited 35×
• In Re Digi International, Inc. Securities Litigation
  D. Minnesota· 1998-05-22· cited 32×
• Miller v. Thomas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-09-22· cited 30×
• Hurd v. Monsanto Co.
  S.D. Indiana· 1995-09-25· cited 14×
• In Re Grand Casinos, Inc., Securities Litigation
  D. Minnesota· 1997-12-09· cited 13×
• VanHuss v. Kohn Law Firm S.C.
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2015-09-01· cited 13×
• Strougo Ex Rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. Bassini
  S.D. New York· 1998-04-06· cited 9×
• United States ex rel. Derrick v. Roche Diagnostics Corp.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-06-07· cited 8×
• In re Capital One Derivative Shareholder Litigation
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-06-21· cited 8×
• Kaufman v. Guest Capital, L.L.C.
  S.D. New York· 2005-01-25· cited 3×
• AUSA Life Insurance v. Ernst & Young
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-17· cited 3×
• Stamatio v. Hurco Companies, Inc.
  S.D. Indiana· 1995-07-18· cited 2×

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Warth v. Seldin
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
• Hishon v. King & Spalding
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
• Allen v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
• Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
• Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
• H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
• Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
• Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,453×
• Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
• Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
• Aronson v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
• Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson
  Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,199×
• Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 1,121×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & Young
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-06-12· cited 1,050×
• Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 846×
• Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James Elliot
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 659×
• Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-06-19· cited 393×
• Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-11-20· cited 321×
• Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-07-06· cited 269×
• Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-Appellants
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-04-03· cited 246×