Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that if admitting evidence was error, it was harmless due to the relatively brief attention given to the evidence in relation to the rest of the State’s evidence
• “A court should not construe statutes in a way that leads to unfair or incongruous results, or in a manner which yields results that are inexplicably draconian or that have no discernible purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alvarado v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2019-02-22· cited 2×
• Tanner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-12-14· cited 1×
• Don L. Baker v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-10-20

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Love v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1969-08-08· cited 340×
• Nukapigak v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-13· cited 75×
• Millman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-11-13· cited 59×
• Hamilton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-04-14· cited 33×
• Vigue v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-09-03· cited 30×
• Evans v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-02-23· cited 18×
• Malutin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-01-09· cited 11×
• Linehan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-02-05· cited 10×
• Garland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-12-07· cited 4×