Miller v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the $17,675 child support arrearage owed to Wife is not an asset of the parties’ marriage and should not be included in the marital estate
• “Because it will likely upset the division of property equation, the adjustment of one asset or liability may require the adjustment of another to avoid an inequitable result or may require the reconsideration of the entire division of property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Balicki v. Balicki
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-11-17· cited 67×
• Coca-Cola Co. v. Babyback's International, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-08· cited 18×
• Lisa A. Birkhimer v. Neil S. Birkhimer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-12-26· cited 17×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Quillen v. Quillen
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-08-06· cited 520×
• Dusenberry v. Dusenberry
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-06· cited 59×
• In Re the Marriage of Coyle
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-30· cited 44×
• Simpson v. Simpson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-05-22· cited 39×
• Neffle v. Neffle
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-10-08· cited 35×
• Euler v. Euler
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-11· cited 29×
• Marriage of Hodowal v. Hodowal
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-31· cited 24×
• In Re the Marriage of Stetler
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-11-03· cited 21×
• Warsco v. Hambright
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-31· cited 16×
• Fields v. Fields
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-16· cited 10×